November Relaunch: Opening on 1st November
Xender Facebook logo Linkedin logo Instagram logo Youtube logo
  (+1) 413 400 3003
WhatsApp
WhatsApp Message
Perplexity ChatGPT Claude Gemini

The Citizenship-Fraud Cases at USCIS & What The Agency Looks For Before Granting Citizenship

Perplexity ChatGPT Claude Gemini
The Citizenship-Fraud Cases at USCIS & What The Agency Looks For Before Granting Citizenship

 

Few people read USCIS news releases, but the agency's newsroom over the past week has read like a court docket. The listing shows a conviction in a Florida smuggling case, charges against two New Jersey residents accused of illegal voting and false statements while applying for citizenship, a Kansas indictment, and a Romanian woman's admission to a sham marriage. Each is a small story. However, together they show how closely a citizenship file can be examined by USCIS. 

Here, our EB-1A consultants have commented on precisely that: what would trigger an alarm to USCIS when granting citizenship.

A week of cases

In New Jersey, prosecutors say Patrick Terrance Reid, 61, a Jamaican national, and Danubis Bernat, 49, a Venezuelan national, were each charged with voting by an alien in a federal election and making false statements while applying for citizenship. According to the complaints, both certified on voter forms that they were citizens. Reid allegedly voted in 2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024, and Bernat in 2024. Both later filed Form N-400, which is sworn under penalty of perjury, and each allegedly claimed never to have registered or voted. The voting counts carry up to one year in prison and a $100,000 fine, while the false-statement counts carry up to ten years and $250,000. The cases came from a U.S. Attorney's Office election task force working with the FBI, Homeland Security Investigations and USCIS. As the office stressed, the charges are accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent.

In Kansas, a grand jury indicted George Olawunmi Johnson, 67, a Nigerian national. He faces four counts, including false claim to U.S. citizenship and voting by an alien, over a February 2010 voter registration and a November 2024 ballot. Local reporting noted that a Kansas Secretary of State lawyer described noncitizen voting as very rare.

The USCIS listing also included a Haitian national's guilty plea over voting in the 2024 election, and a Charlotte indictment of a naturalized Bhutanese citizen for naturalization fraud.

Separately, USCIS said it played a critical role in the conviction of Lazaro Alain Cabrera-Rodriguez, 28, of Hialeah, Florida, in a smuggling and money-laundering conspiracy. Evidence showed the group moved thousands of Cubans across the southern border, charging $1,500 to $40,000 and sometimes chartering private planes. A Justice Department official said he "used his travel agency as a front" for the scheme. Sentencing is set for December 17, with a 20-year maximum. This is an immigration-crime case rather than a naturalization one, but it appeared in the same news cycle.

Why the paperwork is often the trap

The false-statement charge matters because the form is a sworn document. A Texas case shows the mechanism. Prosecutors charged Joshua Akpom, a Nigerian permanent resident, with lying on a 2026 naturalization application by denying he had registered or voted, though he allegedly registered in 2017 and voted in 2018. Because of the five-year statute of limitations, they relied on the naturalization offense rather than the voting. In other words, a lie on the form can be prosecuted when the underlying conduct no longer can.

The policy backdrop of these strings of incidents

The prosecutions follow tougher guidance. A 2025 USCIS policy update says noncitizens who falsely claim citizenship or vote unlawfully will be issued a Notice to Appear, and naturalization applications will generally be denied once removal proceedings begin, except for military-service cases. The policy alert adds that unlawful registration or voting can defeat the good-moral-character requirement. Legal Aid Society lawyers warn that USCIS may deny an application, reassess green card status and issue a Notice to Appear.

The politics are also a bit contested and convoluted about it. One conservative outlet tied the New Jersey charges to roughly 6,600 noncitizen registrations that Governor Mikie Sherrill attributed to a "software error." Readers should weigh that framing against Kansas officials' view that such voting is rare.

Seven things USCIS can verify before granting citizenship

  • Good moral character. This means conduct matching the standards of average community members, shown for the statutory period (five years, or three for spouses of citizens) through the Oath of Allegiance.
  • Criminal history. Applicants must document any criminal record as part of the evidence file.
  • Voting. As shown above, unlawful registration or voting can defeat good moral character.
  • False statements. Every N-400 answer is sworn, and a past claim to be a U.S. citizen can disqualify an applicant.
  • Prior immigration history. How you obtained your green card can affect whether USCIS approves you or revisits your status. A sham-marriage case such as the Romanian plea shows why.
  • Tax issues. Good-moral-character documents address tax obligations alongside criminal history.
  • Travel and residence. Applicants must list every absence since becoming a permanent resident, and absences of six months or more raise a presumption of broken continuous residence. They must also have lived three months in the filing state or district.

At GCEB1, our EB-1A experts are bringing the latest guidance, analysis and insights to our readers. We also provide attorney-assisted eb-1a guidance to the extraordinary achievers in the U.S. Get in touch with us if you need personalized guidance on merit based immigration. We wish you a safe and stress free immigration journey ahead.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Are these people guilty?

No. The New Jersey and Kansas matters are charges or indictments, and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

2. Why did the New Jersey defendants face false-statement charges?

Prosecutors allege they denied voting on sworn N-400 forms after casting federal ballots.

3. What are the maximum penalties in the New Jersey cases?

Up to one year and $100,000 per voting count, and up to ten years and $250,000 per false-statement count.

4. Is noncitizen voting common?

Officials quoted in Kansas call it very rare, though the federal government is publicizing prosecutions.

5. Can a permanent resident be denied citizenship over voting?

Yes. USCIS policy says unlawful registration or voting can defeat good moral character and may lead to a Notice to Appear.

6. Does the Florida smuggling case involve naturalization?

No. It concerns alien smuggling and money laundering, not citizenship applications.

7. Why did the Texas case use a naturalization charge?

The five-year limitations period barred the voting charge, so prosecutors relied on the false statement.

8. Which absences endanger continuous residence?

Absences of six months or more raise a presumption that residence was broken.

9. What should applicants do to avoid problems?

Answer every N-400 question truthfully, gather documents, and consult a qualified immigration attorney about any past voting, arrests or tax issues.

Sources & further readings

 

Recent Post
How to Write a Compelling EB-2 NIW Proposed Endeavor Statement
How to Write a Compelling EB-2 NIW Proposed Endeavor Statement

The proposed endeavor statement is the portal to your EB-2 National Interest Waiver petition. It shows the extent of your commitment to your work and future contributions to the U.S. Unlike employment-based green cards that require job offers and labor certifications, the NIW pathway allows you to self-petition based on the national importance of your future work in the United States.

The Greatest Yet U.S. Crackdown on H-1B Misuse? Everything You Need to Know
The Greatest Yet U.S. Crackdown on H-1B Misuse? Everything You Need to Know

In a recent onslaught, the Trump administration has effected the severest yet crackdown on the H-1B misuse.
What is The ‘Good Moral Character’ Test for U.S. Citizenship Applicants?
What is The ‘Good Moral Character’ Test for U.S. Citizenship Applicants?

The USCIS under the Trump Administration is making the citizenship criteria more and more stringent. Now, it has a new addition: the dimension of the applicant’s moral character.
Trump Birthright Curbs May Prompt US Passport Checks on Parents
Trump Birthright Curbs May Prompt US Passport Checks on Parents

Previously, an American parent applying for their child's first passport has faced a simple bureaucratic procedure: they needed to prove the child is theirs, and show a photo ID. That routine is now on the verge of a fundamental change. According to a Reuters exclusive published September 1, 2026, the U.S. State Department has drafted guidance that would, for the first time, require parents applying for their children's passports to produce documentary proof of their own citizenship or immigration status. This change is the clearest sign yet of how the Trump administration intends to enforce its latest attempt to narrow birthright citizenship.
US Green Card Approvals Drop Sharply, With Indians Among the Hardest Hit: What the Data Shows
US Green Card Approvals Drop Sharply, With Indians Among the Hardest Hit: What the Data Shows

New data drawn from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) figures show a sharp decline in green card approvals over the past year. Moreover, the Indian applicants are absorbing a disproportionate share of the slowdown. The numbers, compiled and analyzed by immigration research groups including Boundless Immigration and the Cato Institute, paint a picture of an approval system that has tightened considerably since the current administration took office. This is in clear disparity with the overall demand for green cards from Indian nationals, which, on the other hand, continued to climb.
Trump’s Boldest Move Yet? 75 Nations Blacklisted from U.S. Visas
Trump’s Boldest Move Yet? 75 Nations Blacklisted from U.S. Visas

In a thunderbolt of immigration policies, the Trump administration announced an indefinite suspension of immigrant visa processing for citizens of 75 countries starting January 21, 2026. The move, confirmed by the U.S. State Department and reported widely by global news outlets, is framed as part of an effort to “protect U.S. public resources” by restricting entry to individuals deemed likely to become reliant on government welfare.

USCIS Tightens the Rules on Evidence: What Policy Alert PA-2026-05 Means for Benefit Requestors
USCIS Tightens the Rules on Evidence: What Policy Alert PA-2026-05 Means for Benefit Requestors

On August 5, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued Policy Alert PA-2026-05. It is a significant update to the USCIS Policy Manual to change the practices of how officers evaluate evidence and issue Requests for Evidence (RFEs) & Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs). The change reverses a permissive, requestor-friendly approach that had been in place for years. On the other hand, it restores officers’ full discretion to deny incomplete or legally deficient filings outright.
USCIS Is Quietly Redefining ‘Extraordinary Ability’: Here is What Applicants Miss
USCIS Is Quietly Redefining ‘Extraordinary Ability’: Here is What Applicants Miss

The EB-1A “Extraordinary Ability” green card is the dream of many. But few applicants know that meeting the basic legal criteria is not enough to secure approval. In 2025–2026, however, a subtler and more strategic evolution is underway at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), one that goes beyond checkboxes and challenges conventional application approaches.
U.S. Imposes a 15% Cap on International Students: The Future of Foreign Employment Remains Uncertain,
U.S. Imposes a 15% Cap on International Students: The Future of Foreign Employment Remains Uncertain,

As the U.S. visa landscape continues to be unwelcome to foreign students, another White House memo
What Is Trump’s Administration’s Public Charge Rule and How It Could Affect Immigrants
What Is Trump’s Administration’s Public Charge Rule and How It Could Affect Immigrants

The “public charge” rule is one of the most complex and controversial parts of U.S. immigration policy. At its core, it asks whether a non-citizen applying for a visa or a green card may become primarily dependent on government support. Traditionally, this test was narrow. It looked mostly at whether someone received cash welfare or long-term institutional care paid by government funds. Under the Trump administration, the definition of public charge expanded dramatically, with consequences that could reshape legal immigration.